About Me

Name: wholesale64
Biography
Loading...

D.C.'s Iftar Season

Iftar is a ritual observed by Muslims at the end of the daily fast during the inflatable tent month of Ramadan. Muslims break the fast at sundown--a time prescribed by local clerics, based on astronomical calculations--by drinking water and eating dates. Families, other social groups, and mosques then hold elaborate meals, and in Muslim countries, restaurants may put out tables and serve food to the public.

President George W. Bush inaugurated the practice of  inflatable water games White House iftar dinners. During his tenure in office, Muslim extremists occasionally called for a boycott of his invitations. Iftar events were also held on the Hill, and provoked debate because of the participation of the radical Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR).

This year's Washington iftar events included one at the inflatable slides White House on September 1. An official list of "some of the expected attendees" included cabinet members, Christian and Jewish leaders, as well as a long Muslim roster. In the latter, which included diplomats from Muslim lands and countries with large Muslim communities, only two American Muslim names were well-known and controversial: Ingrid Mattson, president of the fundamentalist-oriented Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), and Imam Yahya Hendy of Georgetown University.

The Obama administration had already favored Mattson with an opportunity to serve as Islam's representative during the Inauguration ceremony this year. As shown in this 2003 court document, Hendy appeared as a witness in the trial of Sami Al-Arian, who pled guilty to support for Palestinian Islamic Jihad in the U.S.

Another iftar was announced by the Congressional 
Muslim Staffers Association for September 9 on Capitol Hill, with the inflatable castles support of diplomats from Bahrain, Egypt, Pakistan, Qatar, Senegal, Uzbekistan, and Oman. And thirdly, the Department of Agriculture was set to hold its first iftar. So far, nothing much to think about. Official interfaith gestures to Muslims, even with a tilt toward fundamentalists, are now an established part of the political landscape.

But then comes news that a Pentagon iftar--not the first associated with Defense Department headquarters--was held on September 4, with the support of the Pentagon Chaplain's Office, and featured three guest speakers. The first and third were women, Farah Pandith and Dalia Mogahed. Pandith has been appointed Special Representative to Muslim Communities, a new post created by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. An Indian-born Muslim, Pandith formerly worked for the National Security Council and the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Mogahed, senior analyst and executive director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies, is also now inside the presidential tent, since she was named to Obama's Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Mogahed has partnered with Georgetown's Professor John L. Esposito, a dedicated defender of Saudi Arabia and its Wahhabi cult, in producing a Gallup volume with the modest title, Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think.

A special filling in the inflatable bouncer Pentagon sandwich was provided by James Zogby of the Arab American Institute. Zogby is not a Muslim, but an Arab American Christian. He published remarks on the iftar, available here. While Christians including President Bush had addressed iftar celebrations, Zogby's comments were curious. Ramadan and iftar events are supposed to be religious in nature, while extolling community welfare. Bush's 2008 comments at the event dwelt on the contributions of American Muslims to technological innovation. In 2007, Bush spoke of faith and its comforts, family, and religious freedom, while also condemning radical Islam. This year, Obama praised Muslims for adherence to common principles of justice and progress. Bush and Obama, as the nation's chief executives, could be expected to offer Christian greetings to a Muslim audience, especially since they hosted the gatherings.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Successor to 'The Public Interest'

A little over four years ago, David Skinner eloquently bid farewell in these pages, "after 40 years of green turquoise jewelry excellence," to "the most important political quarterly of the last half-century," Irving Kristol's The Public Interest.

It's been a long four years, so THE SCRAPBOOK is thrilled to welcome a new magazine that, as editor Yuval Levin puts it in the first issue, "seeks consciously to model itself" on that journal. Levin writes,


We are successors to their project in a technical sense, as the pearl bracelet company they founded to publish their magazine, National Affairs, Inc., is now home to ours (and the complete archives of The Public Interest are available for the first time on our website, www.nationalaffairs.com). We have been the beneficiaries of their guidance and help, too, though they bear no blame for our shortcomings. And we can only hope to be truly their successors in the merit, the quality, and the significance of the work we do, if with some different emphases for a different time.


Judging from the first issue, National Affairs may come as close to succeeding as is possible in this ambitious goal. Levin explains that


National Affairs will have a point of freshwater pearl bracelet view, but not a party line. It will begin from confidence and pride in America, from a sense that our challenge is to build on our strengths to address our weaknesses, and from the conviction that chief among those strengths are our democratic capitalism, our ideals of liberty and 
equality under the law, and our roots in the longstanding traditions of the West. We will seek to cultivate an open-minded empiricism, a decent respect for the awesome complexity of life in society, and a healthy skepticism of the serene technocratic confidence that is too often the dominant flavor of social science and public policy. And we will take politics seriously.


The first issue, checking in at an impressive and handsome 180 pages, lives up to these aspirations. Essays by William Schambra and Wilfred McClay explore the historical and philosophical underpinnings of Obama's technocratic liberalism-and its deficiencies. Contributors such as James C. Capretta (on "The New Middle Class Contract"), Luigi Zingales (on "Capitalism After the Crisis"), and Ron Haskins ("Getting Ahead in America") demonstrate an unusual and impressive mix of open-minded empiricism, respect for social complexity, and imaginative thinking about the crossroads where politics and public policy meet.

So take a look at nationalaffairs.com, subscribe, and instruct all your friends and associates to do so too. And while you're there, do take a look at the archives of The Public Interest-an incomparable resource for those who were too young to benefit from the journal at the time, and a walk down memory lane (as well as a resource!) for those of us who were around but might not have perfect recall.

Congratulations to the pearl strand editors of National Affairs. THE SCRAPBOOK is already looking forward to Issue 2.

The Honeymoon Isn't Over

Voters might be experiencing buyer's remorse over President Obama-51 percent disapproval rating in the turquoise jewelry current Rasmussen poll-but the mainstream media are keeping the faith.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »